Legal Opinion
Forrest v. Corzine
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 9, 2010No. Civil 09-1555 (JBS/JS)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER 1
JOEL SCHNEIDER, United States Magistrate Judge.
The issue before the Court is whether to grant the City of Camden’s (“Camden”) motion to stay all or a portion of the case pending the completion of an ongoing criminal investigation and prosecution of five (5) Camden police officers. For the reasons to be discussed Camden’s motion is DENIED. 2
Background
This action stems from alleged police misconduct involving two (2) Camden po lice officers. 3 Plaintiff Alanda Forrest (“Forrest”) filed his pro se complaint on April 2, 2009. Forrest subsequently retained an attorney who filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kresefky v. Panasonic Communications & Systems Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Groark v. TimekDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- 1940 ROUTE 9, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER, NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-cv-14753District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- AMMEX CORPORATION v. BuckwoldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- BAIS BRUCHA INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER, NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.