Legal Opinion
Lucero v. Mathews
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 1995No. 94-54PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
Appellant Joseph Lucero appeals from an order and decree denying his motion for summary judgment as a matter of law. The district court found that questions of material fact existed and that Lucero was not entitled to qualified immunity for three causes of actions alleged in appellee Larry Mathews’ complaint, to wit: breach of contract, deprivation of property without due process, and deprivation of first amendment rights. Lucero now appeals.
We affirm.
I. ISSUES
Lucero presents the following issue and subissues for review:
Did the district court err when it failed to grant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Koessel v. Sublette County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Statement of Termination of Davis v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Hesse v. Town of Jackson, Wyo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Greene v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Kanzler v. RennerWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.