Legal Opinion

Ahearn v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 6, 1949No. 48610PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Our decision today in Thomas G. Gibney v. United States, No. 48572, disposes also of this case. The fact that this plaintiff performed some extra services of the exempt or non-reimbursable class, while all of Gibney’s services were of the nonexempt class, is not material and does not affect his right to recover extra compensation for such services. O’Rourke v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 83.

The plaintiff is entitled to recover. Entry of judgment is suspended pending receipt of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due plaintiff in accordance with this opinion.

In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ellicott Machine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Schaible v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Wiley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. GrahamUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Carpenter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API