Legal Opinion
Schaible v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 12, 1956No. Nos. 46784, 46873, 46941, 46945, 46956, 46968, 46974, 46990, 46998, 47021, 47022, 47146, 47166, 47344; Nos. 46565, 46637, 46638, 46715, 46716, 46726, 46764, 46769, 46781, 46783, 46833, 46930, 46933; Nos. 45839, 45843, 45845PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*892Opinion
per curiam,.;
These cases were heard by the Honorable W. Ney Evans, a commissioner ox this court, who rendered reports of his findings of fact. By an order of the court dated July 25, 1955, the court pursuant to Buie 45 (c), directed Commissioner Evans to submit recommendations for conclusions of law in these cases. líe has done so, in the form of an opinion giving reasons and citing precedents. The court adopts the opinion and conclusions of Commissioner Evans which are printed below and renders judgments for the plaintiffs in the amounts shown in the Conclusion of Law.
It is so ordered.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Glavey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Utermehle v. NormentSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. SymondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Gray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Olympic Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958
- Gray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956