Bonifacio v. Stuart
California Court of Appeal
The. facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The defendant, in the trial court, has appealed from an adverse judgment as to his title to a fractional interest in certain lands in Monterey County. The defendant acted as attorney for the plaintiff in the case of Espinosa v. Bonifacio et al., No. 6436, records superior court, state of California, in and for the county of Monterey, that being the same litigation referred to in Espinosa v. Stuart, ante, p. 477, [199 Pac. 66], and which is hereby referred to for additional facts. In his complaint the plaintiff alleged that he was the owner of an undivided one thirty-second interest in certain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Gold v. GreenwaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Schurman v. LookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Hendricks v. SeftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Priester v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.