Frank Cereste v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The evidence sufficed to support a verdict that defendant had been negligent in not providing plaintiff a safe place to work. It was for the jury to determine whether the presence on the path of the coal, on which plaintiff tripped, constituted negligence.1
2. Defendant, on cross-examination of plaintiff, brought out evidence tending to show that, before trial, he had stated to some of defendant’s representatives that he did not know what caused him to stumble. Defendant offered no written statement signed by plaintiff. Even if we assume that this pre-trial statement…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Steve Kozman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., and Allied Maintenance Corporation, Third-Party and Allied Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Fourth-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- La France v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- Miller v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
- Bernard J. Mahoney v. New York Central Railroad and Universal Concrete Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Fassbinder v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.