Legal Opinion

Isaac v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1971No. Appeal, 14PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Appellant, Ralph Isaac, brought an action of assumpsit seeking to recover on a sickness and accident indemnity policy issued by appellee insurance company. The company defended on the grounds that the appellant had procured a second policy and, therefore, appellant had no right to recover on the first policy. At the conclusion of a jury trial held to decide the issue, the court submitted to the jury the following special question relating to the replacement issue: “As of December 31, 1963, did the plaintiff intend to procure a second policy from the defendant,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scheel v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Harty v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Wisniewski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Lomma v. Ohio Nat'l Life Assurance Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Hunt v. Herman Pneumatic Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Herring v. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API