Isaac v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice O’Brien,
Appellant, Ralph Isaac, brought an action of assumpsit seeking to recover on a sickness and accident indemnity policy issued by appellee insurance company. The company defended on the grounds that the appellant had procured a second policy and, therefore, appellant had no right to recover on the first policy. At the conclusion of a jury trial held to decide the issue, the court submitted to the jury the following special question relating to the replacement issue: “As of December 31, 1963, did the plaintiff intend to procure a second policy from the defendant,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scheel v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Harty v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Wisniewski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Lomma v. Ohio Nat'l Life Assurance Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Hunt v. Herman Pneumatic Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Herring v. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.