Legal Opinion

Harty v. Standard Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1959No. Appeal, 283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Boic,

The question before us is whether or not there was á substitution of one insurance policy for another.

There was an effort to issue group health and accident insurance to the Pennsylvania Realtors Association, but they were held by the Attorney General not to be professional persons and the policies were therefore issued to them individually.

Plaintiff’s husband received his policy in 1948 and by successive renewals maintained it until March 31, 1954. This policy contained a thirty-one days’ grace period and required sixty days’ notice to terminate it. There was no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Stanley Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Levan v. Pottstown, Phœnixville Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Miller v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. M. Arnfeld & Son v. Guardian Assurance Co. of LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lee v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Advanced Management Research, Inc. v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Scott v. Southwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Isaac v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API