Legal Opinion

Bank of Commerce v. Ryan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The note, mortgage and parties now before us are the same as those in Bank of Commerce of Oregon City v. Ryan, 152 Or. 614 (52 P. (2d) 1139). This is a continuation of that controversy. By referring to that decision it will be observed that the suit was begun by a complaint which alleged separately three causes: (a) A cause of suit based upon a note and mortgage executed by the estate of Thomas F. Ryan, deceased. It averred defaults and prayed for judgment on the note and a foreclosure of the mortgage against all of the defendants, (b) A cause of suit affecting only the three defendants who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. First State Bank of Oklahoma City v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Bank of Commerce v. RyanOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaver Forwarding Co. v. Eagle Star InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Portland Trust & Savings Bank v. Lincoln Realty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Rexnord, Inc. v. FerrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API