Legal Opinion

City of North Mankato v. Carlstrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1942No. 33,111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff prevathed in its suit for specific performance of a contract to convey certain land to defendant. The latter’s blended motion for amended findings or new trial being denied, he appeals.

The land involved is a part of and lies within the platted area of plaintiff municipality. In April 1941, the parties entered into a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to sell and defendant to purchase and pay $125 for the land upon tender by plaintiff of a deed of special warranty, together with an abstract showing a “good and merchantable title” in plaintiff. Such deed was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Hubachek v. Maxbass Security BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Ruff v. GerhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alumni Ass'n of University v. Hart Agency, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dittrich v. UblSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Burkhead v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Daly v. Duwane Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API