Legal Opinion

Danielson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 5, 1952No. 49787PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

This is an action by a Major, United States Army, Retired, to recover the difference between the retired pay of a Major with over 27 years’ service, which he contends he is entitled to receive, and the retired pay of a Major with over 21 years’ service, which he has received from the period July 1, 1946 to the date judgment may be entered herein.

Plaintiff was appointed a Second Lieutenant, National Army, on September 29, 1917, and First Lieutenant, United States Army, on October 12, 1918. On September 23, 1920, he was appointed First Lieutenant, Regular Army, with rank from July…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Aflague v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Richard L. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API