Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 31, 2000No. 22148-97UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, F.K.A. CHRYSLER HOLDING CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION AND ITS CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Chrysler Corp. v. Commissioner

No. 22148-97

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2000-283; 2000 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 332; 80 T.C.M. (CCH) 334; T.C.M. (RIA) 54035;

August 31, 2000, Filed

An appropriate order will be issued granting respondent's motion for partial summary judgment.

James P. Fuller, Ronald B. Schrotenboer, Kenneth B. Clark, James

C. Garahan, and Laura K. Zeigler, for petitioner.

Robin L.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Chrysler Corporation v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Gold Forever Music, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. CHRYSLER CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  5. King Solarman, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API