Legal Opinion

Gold Forever Music, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 10, 2019No. 18-1789PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

The statute of limitations for a wrongful levy action cannot begin until there has been a levy that attaches to the property at issue. In this case, notices of levy in 2012 did not constitute levies on royalties generated after the notices were served. For the reasons set forth below, the statute of limitations does not bar Gold Forever's wrongful levy action. Accordingly, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings.

I

Gold Forever Music, Inc. (Gold Forever) is a music publishing company that has entered into agreements with various…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gold Forever Music, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API