Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Sally Salmon Seafood

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1988No. WCB 84-13447, 85-01254; CA A38730; SC S33962Published

1Opinion of the Court

757 P.2d 410 (1988)

306 Or. 25

In the matter of the Compensation of Pamela R. STOVALL, Claimant.

Pamela R. Stovall, Respondent On Review,

v.

SALLY SALMON SEAFOOD and Ebi Companies, Respondents On Review, and

Hallmark Fisheries and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, Petitioners On Review.

WCB 84-13447, 85-01254; CA A38730; SC S33962.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted November 5, 1987.

Decided June 7, 1988.

Paul L. Roess, Coos Bay, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners on review.

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent on review Stovall. With…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API