O'Keefe v. Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement System
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered b,v
Perskie, J.
This is a state pension case. The narrow question for decision is whether prosecutrix is entitled, as claimed for the state, onhr to the payment of the “accumulated deductions” standing to the credit of her deceased hus band in the ..Vnnuity Savings Eund (R. S. 43:14 — 29), or whether, as claimed for the prosecutrix, she is additional^ entitled to an allowance of one-half of the “final compensation” (R. 8. 43:14-l.e) of her deceased husband, as a “pension” to her “to continue (luring her widowhood.” B. 8. 43:14-37’.
Martin R. O’Keefe was a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Fedi v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Hackensack Trust Co. v. City of HackensackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Ott v. BraddockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Herod v. Mutual Chemical Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Velo-Bind, Inc. v. ScheckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Department of Labor and Industry v. RosenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Rosenthal v. STATE EMPLOYEES', SYSTEM OF NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- In Re CarlsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.