Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. STATE EMPLOYEES', SYSTEM OF NJ
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 16, 1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 136 (1954)
103 A.2d 896
PEARL ROSENTHAL, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,
v.
STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 1, 1954.
Decided March 16, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.
Mr. Samuel Weitzman argued the cause for the claimant-appellant (Messrs. Parsonnet, Weitzman & Oransky, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph A. Murphy, Assistant Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. Daniel De Brier, Deputy Attorney-General, on the brief; Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hoffman v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Nagy v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. SterlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reale v. Tp. of WayneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Iowa Civil Rights Commission v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Department of Labor and Industry v. RosenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- De Nike v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC., RETIREMENT SYS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Hopkins v. NeeldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.