Legal Opinion

Dalenko v. Peden General Contractors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 2009No. COA08-170PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff may not attempt to revive previously litigated claims by filing an independent action. An arbitration award is a final adjudication of a matter, subject to the specific matters for which it may be set aside by the trial court. Plaintiff’s appeal of a non-appealable interlocutory order does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction to proceed with the case. Parties cannot by contract select a trial judge to hear their lawsuit. The trial courts have discretion to bar parties from abusing the courts with frivolous and repetitive litigation.

I. Procedural Background and Factual History

A.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Carolina Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. PooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dalenko v. StephensDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
  2. Dalenko v. Peden General Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Dalenko v. Peden General Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Columbus County D.S.S. ex rel. Moore v. NortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. Jessey Sports, LLC v. Intercollegiate Men's Lacrosse Coaches Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API