Legal Opinion

Hollcraft v. Douglass

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1888No. 11,943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Hollcraft claims title to lots 3, 5 and 6 in Joseph Baum’s addition to the city of Frankfort, through a. sheriff’s sale.

Douglass claims that that sale was and is void, and asks in his complaint that it be so declared, and that the lots be subjected to execution in satisfaction of two judgments of which he is the owner.

*140So far as material here, the substance of his complaint is, that, on the 13th day of October, 1875, and at the October-term of the Clinton Circuit Court, one John Shaff recovered a judgment against him and Joseph Baum; that, on the same day, said Shaff also recovered a judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elston v. CastorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Baker v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Jones v. Kokomo Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Jones v. CarnahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Richey v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leonard v. BroughtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Willard v. BringolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Vordermark v. WilkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ribelin v. PeughIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API