Legal Opinion
Tice v. Tice
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 22, 1983No. 57996PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The question presented is whether a person, who induces another to marry by the oral promise to reimburse any lost alimony in the event of a subsequent divorce, is liable to pay alimony awarded under a previous divorce decree.
Evalyn (appellee-wife) and Charles Tice (appellant-husband) were married in Las Vegas, Nevada on December 31,1979. Previously, Evalyn had received an alimony award from her first husband in the amount of $72,000.00. The divorce decree provided that the alimony would terminate upon her death or remarriage. At the time of her marriage to Charles, there was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. PackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Cantrell v. LaidlawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Mashunkashey v. MashunkasheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McMillianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- E.G. Thompson and Betty Thompson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Bowman v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.