Legal Opinion

Lindquist v. City of Lindsborg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1948No. 37,235PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*213The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

The plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a mandamus action in which she sought to compel the city of Lindsborg, the mayor and council, to issue a license to sell cereal malt beverages at retail at a named address. The city clerk was also made a party defendant.

An alternative writ was issued. The city challenged the writ by motion to quash on the ground the writ and the amended motion therefor, mentipned in the writ, did not require the relief sought. The motion was by the parties and the court treated as a demurrer under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Richards v. TiernanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Tillotson v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Baxter Springs v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Curless v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Horyna v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API