BRC Lease Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court in this contract dispute action brought pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006), is the defendant’s (“government’s”) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).1 For the reasons set forth below, the government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND FACTS
A. The Contract Dispute
The relevant facts are taken from the complaint and may be summarized as follows: This case arises from a dispute between the National Institutes…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Bowers Investment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ogunniyi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Woodruff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.