Legal Opinion

In re Warner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2002No. 01-BG-1049PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent Alan G. Warner was publicly censured by the Supreme Court of Kansas for failing to reduce a contingent fee agreement to writing, failing to reimburse a witness for travel expenses for which his client had provided funds, and refusing to pay the witness’s travel expenses after promising to do so. In addition to his public censure, respondent was ordered to reimburse the witness for her travel expenses in the amount of $728.41. See In re Warner, 270 Kan. 119, 11 P.3d 1160 Kan.2000

Bar Counsel filed with this court a certified copy of the Kansas disciplinary order, and this court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API