Legal Opinion
Valt v. Woodall Industries, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1974No. 1 September Term 1973, Docket No. 54,045PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwainson, J.
The facts in this case are not in *684dispute.1 Appellant Sarah Valt was injured in the course of her employment with appellee Woodall Industries, Inc. on Thursday, May 23, 1968. The injury to her hand, thumb and wrist, rendered her unable to return to work from Friday, May 24 until Monday, June 3 (a period of ten calendar days). At the time of her injury, appellant earned an average weekly salary of $111.36.
The employer and its insurance carrier voluntarily compensated appellant according to their interpretation of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Part II, § 3;2 and Part II, § 9.3 They treated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Kizer v Livingston County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tagliavia v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Brady v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Peiffer v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Brady v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Valt v. Woodall Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974