Legal Opinion

Desmond v. Fawcett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1917PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Tort in three counts, the first for alleged malicious prosecution, the second for alleged extortion and the malicious institution and prosecution of a civil action and the third for alleged conspiracy to harass the plaintiff and extort money from him by criminal prosecutions and civil actions. Writ dated November 10, 1911. In the Superior Court the case was tried before Hardy, J. The course of the trial is described in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Tort in three counts, the first for alleged malicious prosecution, the second for alleged extortion and the malicious institution and prosecution of a civil action and the third for alleged conspiracy to harass the plaintiff and extort money from him by criminal prosecutions and civil actions. Writ dated November 10, 1911. In the Superior Court the case was tried before Hardy, J. The course of the trial is described in the opinion. The judge ordered a verdict for the defendants on all three counts of the plaintiff’s declaration; and the plaintiff alleged exceptions. The plaintiff in his brief…

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

At the argument the plaintiff waived all exceptions which had to do with the second and third counts. The remaining count was for malicious prosecution. At the trial the judge directed a verdict for the defendants and the case is here on exceptions to that ruling and to the exclusion of evidence offered by the plaintiff.

The facts bearing on these exceptions were in substance these: The defendants Robert and Robert J. Fawcett (father and son and partners in business) had borrowed of the plaintiff several sums of money amounting in the aggregate to $1,000. In June, 1909, the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Burt v. PlaceNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Hartshorn v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zygmuntowicz v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Zablonsky v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Broussard v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Pilos v. First National Stores Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API