In re Pennington
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Chief Judge,
delivered tlie opinion of the court:
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, rejecting claims 9-15, the only remain*790ing claims in appellant’s application for a patent for a “Rotatable Evaporative Cooler for Air-Conditioning,” as unpatentable over the prior art. Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of the decision was granted by the board but resulted only in a modification of its opinion, without any change in the decision rendered.
Claims 9 and 14, which are illustrative of the appealed claims, read as follows:
9. A…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re EarleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
3Cited by8 opinions
- Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Windmere Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
- Application of George E. Linnert and Ronald H. EspyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Jules RothCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Neal A. PenningtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Roger GilmontCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.