Legal Opinion

In re Pennington

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 21, 1957No. 6250PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Chief Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, rejecting claims 9-15, the only remain*790ing claims in appellant’s application for a patent for a “Rotatable Evaporative Cooler for Air-Conditioning,” as unpatentable over the prior art. Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of the decision was granted by the board but resulted only in a modification of its opinion, without any change in the decision rendered.

Claims 9 and 14, which are illustrative of the appealed claims, read as follows:

9. A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  3. In re EarleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Windmere Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
  2. Application of George E. Linnert and Ronald H. EspyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Jules RothCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. Application of Neal A. PenningtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  5. Application of Roger GilmontCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API