Legal Opinion

Application of Neal A. Pennington

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 18, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6777PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The Board of Appeals affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claim 33 of appellant’s application for patent Serial No. 473,509, filed December 7, 1954, for improvements in a “COMBINED HUMIDIFIER-DEHUMIDIFIER.” The rejection, based on 35 U.S.C. § 103, is that the claimed invention would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in view of the references which are:

Newton et al. 2,200,243 May 14, 1940

Farr 2,286,480 June 16, 1942

The single claim on appeal reads as follows:

“33. A humidity changer for air conditioning, comprising; two air passages; means for impelling air through each of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re PenningtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. In re LiebergeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pennington v. Commissioner of PatentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API