Legal Opinion
State v. Ortiz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 25, 2006No. AC 25879PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Alex Ortiz, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following his conditional plea of nolo contendere 1 to one count each of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b) and possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a public school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress certain evidence seized from his apartment. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. BladesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Landry v. SpitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. FauselSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. OwenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. StithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. OlsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.