Legal Opinion
State v. Olson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 21, 2009No. AC 29581PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Christopher Olson, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that his sentence had not been imposed in an illegal manner because the court did not order that a presentence investigation report (report) be prepared prior to sentencing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following undisputed facts and procedural history are relevant to the issue before us. On August 24, 2006, the defendant, in accordance with a plea agreement with the state,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Steadwell v. Warden, Connecticut Correctional Institution, SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Martin M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- People v. BowermanColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. PierceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. WadeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Santoro v. SantoroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.