Barouh v. Haberman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), J.
- Plaintiff and appellant Robert Barouh brought this action against defendant and respondent Morton Haberman for battery and negligent personal injury. The action was tried to a jury, which found by special verdict that defendant was not negligent (12-0) and that defendant did not commit battery (9-3). Plaintiff appeals from the judgment on the jury verdict, contending the evidence does not support the verdict and the court erred in refusing plaintiffs requested special instructions on battery. Agreeing with the latter contention, we reverse for a new trial.
Facts
Plainti…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Ashcraft v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Avila v. Citrus Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Cole v. Doe 1 Thru 2 Officers of Emeryville Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Avila v. Citrus Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Bolbol v. Rowell Ranch Rodeo, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Lobo v. TamcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.