Legal Opinion

Cole v. Doe 1 Thru 2 Officers of Emeryville Police Department

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 1, 2005No. C-03-5643 EMCPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 57)

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Paul D. Cole has filed suit against Defendants the City of Emeryville, Officer Edward Mayorga, and Officer Robert Alton for violation of his civil rights. More specifically, Mr. Cole has sued the individual officers for violation of § 1983 (the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and to equal protection); violation of California Civil Code § 52.1 and the California Constitution, article I, § 13 (the right to be free from…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Shoyoye v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Garcia v. City of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  4. Cuviello v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  5. Medrano v. Kern County Sheriff's OfficerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API