Legal Opinion

Bull v. Smith

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChRisttaNSON, J.

This is a sequel to Bull v. Smith, 45 N. D. 613, 178 N. W. 426. The maternal facts are as follows: In May 1910 the defendant Smith, purchased from one Keenan a tract of land in Burleigh county in this state upon which there was a mortgage executed by Keenan and his wife. The plaintiff, Bull, in due course purchased such note and mortgage and the same were duly assigned to him. Later he brought this action to foreclose the mortgage, joining the mortgagors and Smith as defendants therein. In his complaint the plaintiff averred that the defendant, Smith, at the time of the purchase of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Englund v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Chapin & Mastick v. BroderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. McDonald v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Rollins v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burrows v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Farmers Nat. Bank v. WrightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Union Central Life Insurance v. AlfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API