Legal Opinion

Carissimi v. Jonas

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1997No. Docket 171812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeff, P.J.

This appeal stems from the circuit court’s order of summary disposition for third-party defendant, Aldon Carissimi, dismissing the contribution claim brought by third-party plaintiffs, the Jonases. They appeal that order as of right, and we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

The material facts of this case are not in dispute. In June 1991, Aldon Carissimi was operating his motor vehicle while his eight-year-old daughter, Theresa Carissimi, rode in the front passenger seat, allegedly without wearing her seat belt. At some point on the day in question, an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ullery v. SobieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Virgilio v. HartfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Salim v. LaGuireMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Thompson v. FitzpatrickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mann v. St Clair County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Moisenko v. VOLKSWAGEN AGDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
  3. Mann v. St Clair County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API