Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. First Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1926No. 16847PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff, defendant in error, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants, in the district court of Osage county, to recover balance due on a certain promissory note alleged to have been executed by one Wah-sho-shah, now deceased, and his wife, Rosa Wah-sho-shah, defendants.

The note originally was executed by said parties to one R. W. Arnold, and was given as the purchase price of 102 head of cattle, 100 of which was valued at $60- per head, and two at $150 per head, the total purchase price being $6,300 and ten iier cent, annual interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Dunkin v. Waurika Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Tinker v. McLaughlin-farrar Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alkire v. AcuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Harrell v. LondonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Cohen v. Superior Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API