Legal Opinion
Goldsmith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 5, 1930No. 240PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was convicted of a violation of section 28, United States Criminal Code (USCA title 18, § 72). This section makes it a crime to “falsely make, alter, forge, or counterfeit, or cause or procure to be falsely made, altered, forged, or counterfeited, or willingly aid, or assist in the false making, altering, forging, or counterfeiting, any bond, bid, proposal, contract, guarantee, security, official bond, public record, affidavit, or other writing for the purpose of defrauding the United States; or shall utter or publish .as true, or cause to be uttered or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Cliquot's ChampagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Las Vegas Merchant Plumbers Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Armando C. SantosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Langer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. John Wayne BaranskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Anderson v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.