Legal Opinion

Banks v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 23, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00158Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MARK BANKS, Petitioner v. No. 3:21-cv-00158 (JAM) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DENIAL OF § 2255 MOTION Petitioner Mark Banks has moved for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) of the Court’s prior denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. I will deny the motion on the ground that it seeks relief beyond the scope of Rule 60(b) and without prejudice to the right of Banks to seek relief before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Roy William Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Luciano SorrentinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. James GainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API