Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoskins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 26, 2018No. Docket No. 17-70-cr; August Term, 2017PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Circuit Judge:

We are asked to decide whether a defendant asserts a cognizable claim when he seeks to challenge through a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion a sentence imposed pursuant to the district court's adoption of the parties' Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement where a judgment on a predicate offense that factored into the Guidelines analysis for his sentencing has since been vacated. Because this defendant has failed to show on the record before us that the original sentence, if allowed to stand, effects a miscarriage of justice, we hold it was error to vacate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. Omar FolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. Banks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  3. Behiry v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  4. Bello v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  5. Bright v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API