Legal Opinion
In Re Guardianship of Dorson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 31, 2007No. 2007-031PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianiS, J.
The respondent, Peerless Insurance Company/Liberty Mutual Surety (Peerless), appeals an order of the Hillsborough County Probate Court {Cassavechia, J.) requiring Peerless to reimburse the estate of Robert D. Dorson $25,988.48, which represents the surcharge the court imposed upon the ward’s prior guardian, Nelson Dorson. We affirm.
The record supports the following: The probate court appointed Nelson guardian over Robert’s person and estate; Nelson obtained a surety bond from Peerless. In June 2004, Nelson sought permission from the court to relocate Robert to American Samoa and to borrow…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- In Re ScheidmantelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- LaMontagne Builders, Inc. v. Bowman Brook Purchase GroupSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- In Re Estate of ScharlachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Singer Asset Finance Co., LLC v. WynerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Evan W. Gray v. Chester L. Gray IIIDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Glynn v. IMPACT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, INC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Glynn v. Impact Science & Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Gray v. GrayDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023