Legal Opinion
Glynn v. Impact Science & Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 25, 2011No. Civil No. JFM-07-1660PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dennis Glynn (“Glynn”) filed suit against Defendants, Impact Science & Technology, Inc. (“1ST”) and EDO Corporation (“EDO”),1 on June 21, 2007, alleging, inter alia, retaliation in violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), post-termination FCA retaliation, declaratory judgment, and a Haddle claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2).2 In turn, 1ST filed counterclaims against Glynn and Saltwhistle Technology, LLC (“SWT”)3 on April 11, 2008, which would eventually include breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duty,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glynn v. IMPACT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, INC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011