Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FRYE, District Judge:
The matter before the court is the objections of the plaintiffs to the Findings and Recommendation filed on December 14, 1993 by the Honorable Donald C. Ashmanskas, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiffs filed this action seeking to enjoin the defendants, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and James H. Quello, from enforcing 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C), which is a part of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, and which provides, in pertinent part:(b) Restrictions on the use of automated telephone equipment(1) Prohibitions
It shall be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kenro, Inc. v. Fax Daily, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- Texas v. American Blastfax, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2000
- Hooters of Augusta, Inc. v. American Global InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2003
- Missouri Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Blast Fax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Chair King, Inc. v. GTE Mobilnet of Houston, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.