Legal Opinion

Heiss ex rel. Heiss v. Nielsen

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided April 8, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 443PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

The item requiring the attention of the court is a motion of the defendant Petrich to quash summons and return of service. Its grounds will shortly be noted with particularity. Other issues preliminary to trial are made by the pleadings, but by an allowed stipulation of the parties, they are not presently to be ruled upon.

On October 5, 1954, the plaintiff instituted this action in which jurisdiction is founded solely on diversity of citizenship, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(a) (1). He seeks to recover damages for personal injuries by him allegedly sustained in an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Consolidated Stone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. McCoy v. SilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. Schlaefer v. SchlaeferCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bavouset v. Shaw's of San FranciscoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1967
  2. Chas. D. Long and Samuel H. Liberman, Trustees, and Paul E. Hord and Jane S. Hord v. Victor Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. H & F Barge Co. v. Garber Bros.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
  4. McGah v. VM CORPORATIONDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
  5. Shaw v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API