Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bengston v. Greening

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1950No. 34,996Published

1DissentMagney, Justice

Where an employe is on a special errand or mission for his employer, the workmen’s compenastion act covers him from the time he leaves his home or the place from which he leaves at the employer’s request until he returns to his home or such a place via a reasonable route. Reese v. National Surety Co. 162 Minn. 493, 203 N. W. 442; Bookman v. Lyle C. & R. Equipment Co. 153 Minn. 479, 190 N. W. 984; Nehring v. Minnesota M. & M. Co. 193 Minn. 169, *142258 N. W. 307; Fox v. Atwood-Larson Co. 203 Minn. 245, 280 N. W. 856; Fitzgibbons v. Clarke, 205 Minn. 235, 285 N. W. 528; Oestreich v. Lakeside…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Scott v. WillisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  3. Nehring v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Fitzgibbons v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Markoff v. Emeralite Surfacing Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API