Legal Opinion

Stocker v. City of Nashville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The City of Nashville owns a large parldike area lying beyond the City limits, on which it has erected and maintains a municipal Airport, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 116, Public Acts of 1933 (Williams’ Annotated Code, Section 2726.22), the caption and material parts of which are as follows:

“An Act to prohibit the bringing or maintaining of any action or suit against any municipality, or its officers, agents, servants or employees, in or about the superintendent or management of any municipal airport.
“Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, That…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. MacMullen v. . City of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Christopher v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Fleming v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Irvine v. ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Highwoods Properties, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Williams v. Town of MorristownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  4. Anderson v. Jackson Mun. Airport Auth.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Wendler v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API