Beers v. Zettelmeyer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The single error of which plaintiff complains is the giving of the requested charge before *523argument. He contends that the violation of Section 6307-13, General Code, constituted negligence per se for the reason that the defendant was required by such statute to yield the right of way to the vehicle in which the plaintiff was riding. The pertinent portion of Section 6307-13, General Code, is as follows:
“Whenever traffic is controlled by traffic-control signals exhibiting the words ‘go,’ ‘caution,’ or ‘stop’ or exhibiting different colored lights- successively one at a time, or with arrows, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morris v. BloomgreenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. GoldmanOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Will v. McCoyOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Grass v. AkeOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Welch v. Canton City Lines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.