Legal Opinion

Matter of Sekerez

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1984No. 880S357PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

This disciplinary matter is before us on a seven-count Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action filed against the Respondent, Zarko Sekerez, by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission. A Hearing Officer, appointed by this Court, has conducted a hearing pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 238 and has submitted his findings of fact. The Respondent now petitions for review of these findings. The Respondent also has filed a Motion for Oral Argument, a Petition for a Trial de Novo, and a Petition for Hearing on Constitutional Challenges. Both parties have…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Matter of StantonIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Kollar v. Civil City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API