Legal Opinion

Thomas Creek Lumber v. Dept. of Forestry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2023No. A167397PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

309 Argued and submitted March 1, affirmed September 27, 2023 THOMAS CREEK LUMBER AND LOG CO., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Oregon Department of Forestry, Defendant-Respondent. Marion County Circuit Court 15CV32928; A167397

537 P3d 615

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying its petition for a statutory way of necessity over state-owned land. Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s deter- mination that plaintiff had not met its burden of establishing the requirements for a way of necessity and that the state did not unreasonably withhold its con- sent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Brookshire v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Allco Enterprises Inc. v. Goldstein Family Living TrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Department of Human Services v. M. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas Creek Lumber v. Dept. of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API