Legal Opinion

Northeast Ohio College of Massotherapy v. Burek

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 2001No. Case No. 99 C.A. 217PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gene Donofrio, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Northeast Ohio College of Massotherapy (“Northeast”) and Mary Ann Angelo (“Angelo”), appeal a decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment in favor of defendantsappellees, John Burek (“Burek”), Diane Alexander (“Alexander”), and Tri-State College of Massotherapy (“Tri-State”).

A review of the record establishes the following uncontroverted facts and series of events.

Burek and Alexander served as instructors at Northeast. On or about August 6, 1997, Alexander informed Northeast that she would be terminating her…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Miami Valley Mobile Health Services, Inc. v. ExamOne Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  2. Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Equipment & Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  3. Jedson Engineering, Inc. v. Spirit Construction Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. Deboer Structures (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Shaffer Tent & Awning Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. Horter Investment Management, LLC v. CutterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API