Snell v. Snell
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCureton, Judge
*416I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the provision in the divorce decree regarding the father’s obligation to pay certain college costs for the daughter to attend “any state University in the state of South Carolina” is unambiguous. Therefore, no interpretation is permitted by the family court. I disagree with the majority that such a determination ends the matter.
The family court held both parties should bear the burden of the daughter’s college expenses and any charges not paid by the trustee should be paid by the parties on an equal basis. I agree with the majority opinion that it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moseley v. MosierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Calvert v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Hicks v. HicksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.