Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 1984No. 0073PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

In this action to enforce an alimony and support obligation, Larry Hicks appeals from orders of the family court finding him in contempt and refusing to reduce his support obligation. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

In a separation agreement, incorporated into a court decree, appellant Hicks agreed on May 26,1980 to pay $250 per month in alimony and $250 per month for each of his three minor children. At the time, he owned a real estate business and had gross earnings for the first half of 1980 of $12,500. He paid the $1,000 support…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Bearden v. BeardenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Eagerton v. EagertonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Floyd v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Haselwood v. SULLIVAN IICourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Pratt v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Woodside v. WoodsideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Garris v. McDuffieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API