Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 8, 1980No. 21347PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This involves modifying a support decree. Appellant Robert Smith was ordered to pay his child’s medical bills of $951.00 and an increase in child support to $35.00 per week due to a change in circumstances. We affirm.

Appellant first asserts the family court erred in refusing to dismiss the action because respondent Inez Smith commenced the proceeding by motions rather than by summons and petition.

There is no indication in the transcript of record that the lower court ruled on this question. An issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal. State v. McDaniel, S. C, 268 S.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Spires v. HigginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Clinkscales v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Cason v. CasonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Campbell v. McPhersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moseley v. MosierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Calvert v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API