Legal Opinion
Rucker v. Sheehy Alexandria, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 13, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-466-APublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELLIS, District Judge.
The matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to alter or amend judgment, pursuant to Rule 59(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., and defendant’s motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b). Through these motions, defendant, an automobile dealer, asks for a reconsideration of the October 9, 2002 Order and the October 16, 2002 Memorandum Opinion, in particular of the finding that the defendant understated the annual percentage rate of inter est (“APR”) in violation of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., by calculating the APR on the basis of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Browne v. Kline Tysons Imports, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- Chrisom Polk v. Crown Auto, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Diane Janikowski v. Lynch Ford, Incorporated, Lynch Chevrolet, Incorporated, Frank J. Lynch IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Rucker v. Sheehy Alexandria, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Coleman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Raceway Ford CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Yarnall v. Four Aces Emporium, Inc. (In Re Boganski)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.